Deal Ends Sylvestre Sex Abuse Civil Trial

September 30, 2010

By: Jane Sims, The London Free Press

Beckett Personal Injury Office's Scales of Justice's article image

It could have been a civil case that would have put the Roman Catholic Diocese of London’s knowledge of Rev. Charles Sylvestre’s sexual abuse of children under the microscope.

Instead, Anne Heathcote’s case against the diocese, retired bishop John Sherlock and Bishop Ronald Fabbro ended abruptly with a settlement Wednesday, but not before a jury heard the opening remarks of both sides.

Sixty-four other civil cases concerning Sylvestre’s sexual abuse of young female parishioners have been settled before reaching trial. More than 10 remain to be completed.

What was clear from opening remarks by Heathcote’s lawyer Robert Talach, and the church’s lawyer Chris Blom, the case would be more about what the church knew and did — and if it should be punished — than an examination of Sylvestre’s crimes over four decades.

Sylvestre was convicted in 2006 of 47 counts of indecent assault involving 47 girls from his parishes in Windsor, London, Sarnia, Chatham and Pain Court.

The majority of the victims in the criminal case were women who’d attended St. Ursula’s parish in Chatham. Heathcote was one of them and Sylvestre pleaded guilty to molesting her as part of the case.

He died in prison in early 2007, at age 84, just months into his three-year sentence.

Heathcote had launched a $4-million claim, including $1 million in punitive damages, years ago.

Details of the settlement Wednesday were confidential.

Outside court, Heathcote said she was relieved the case was done.

“It’s not a process for sissies.”

Before the two sides reached agreement, both outlined what their cases would have been during the four weeks set aside for the trial.

Talach told the jury Heathcote was in Gr. 2 or 3 when she was abused by Sylvestre. He’d arrived at St. Ursula’s in 1966 when Heathcote was two and stayed for 12 years.

Years later, the abuse as a child sunk the over-achieving student and award-winning university graduate into depression, Talach said. She was unable to keep jobs or relationships.

Talach said the diocese knew Sylvestre’s track record as far back as 1953 — long before Heathcote was molested — when a girl in Hamilton reported abuse by the young Sylvestre to her parish priest.

Sylvestre was moved from Hamilton to Windsor, where he was reported again.

He was sent to Sarnia where three girls reported him in 1962 to the police.

Sylvestre was sent, Talach said, to a retreat in Quebec to pray and amend his ways. He was soon back in the pulpit.

Talach said the bishops should have known “what (Sylvestre) was capable of.”

But Blom asked the jury to consider the response relevant to the time period.

While modern responses to sexual abuse are much more vigilant, in the 1950s and ‘60s the reaction was completely different because of a limited understanding of sexual abuse.

Blom said Heathcote was due damages, but the church shouldn’t be punished.

Both sides had planned to call experts in canon law to argue whether the response to Sylvestre’s activities by then-bishop John Cody was adequate.

Blom said it was unlikely subsequent bishops to Cody knew of Sylvestre’s activities because of Cody’s untimely death in 1963. Sherlock, he said, would testify he didn’t know about Sylvestre until 1989.

He also outlined the steps taken by the diocese since Sylvestre’s convictions.

Before the first witness was called, the two sides reported to Superior Court Justice David Little they had a settlement.

Outside court, diocese spokesperson Mark Adkinson said it was important to recognize “that we know and acknowledge Sylvestre did very bad things to the young girls.”

The diocese wants to help victims and to settle cases, he said, “but it has to be a fair and reasonable settlement.”

“It just took a little bit longer than we anticipated to get to that settlement,” he said of Heathcote’s case.

Talach said he was happy Heathcote was able to get “justice without having to endure the entire trial.”

“But as someone who’s worked on these cases, there is a true sense of disappointment that we didn’t get to let the public know the full story and full extent of the diocese’s involvement with Sylvestre.”

The Steps to Proving Negligence in a Personal Injury Claim

December 18, 2024

The Steps to Proving Negligence in a Personal Injury Claim

Proving negligence is often one of the main requirements in personal injury claims. Negligence refers to a failure to act with the reasonable care that a person or entity owes to others. In this blog, we’ll discuss the four requirements needed to prove negligence and receive compensation in a personal injury claim.

Read More
Addressing the Impact of Clergy Sexual Abuse: A Path Toward Healing and Accountability

December 12, 2024

Addressing the Impact of Clergy Sexual Abuse: A Path Toward Healing and Accountability

Clergy sexual abuse is a grave and deeply troubling issue that has impacted countless individuals and communities worldwide. The abuse of power and trust by religious leaders has left scars that are not easily healed. In the wake of these crimes, both the victims and society as a whole must grapple with the consequences of such profound violations. Addressing the impact of clergy sexual abuse requires not only acknowledging the pain it has caused but also taking actionable steps toward accountability, justice, and healing for all involved.

Read More
How to be Successful at Mediation

December 11, 2024

How to be Successful at Mediation

Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution. It is a means for people to settle disputes or lawsuits outside of court. Most people don’t want to go to court. A neutral third party—the mediator—helps the disputing parties look for a solution that works for them. Mediators, unlike judges, do not decide the case. The mediator's role is simply to help the people involved in a dispute to negotiate with each other in a constructive manner, to gain a better understanding of the interests of all parties, and to find a resolution based on common understanding and mutual agreement.

Read More